Talk:Raijin/@comment-32052492-20170610213438/@comment-30076690-20170613144744

i probably would have shot down the ancile first, but closing was definitely good idea.

and if you choose for poor grammar as an addition, then it would be 'skeptic,' try if you are skeptic meaning try if you are a skeptic but without the 'a' because who has time to type that? For that matter, who has time to type an entire paragraph (which is sort of self-referrential) regarding what somebody else did or didn't mean, despite the fact that, not being that person, the author of the paragraph can only speculate, and their opinion has little to no worth, no matter how loquacious they become, or how many words they use, or how long their sentences run on, or how many times they can say 'how many.'