Talk:Leagues/@comment-33829673-20180110185344/@comment-28912339-20180112023939

"freedom of speech cites the government's inability to prosecute most stuff you say.

it does not apply to other citizens. you have no 'free speech' aside from what they choose to give you."

Well, that is only a the legal definition of freedom of speech, however, it is also contextually correct to employ it in any case of censorhip:

"Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or community to articulate one's opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorhip, or sanction"

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech

"The power or right to express one's opinions without censorship, restraint, OR legal penalty."

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/freedom_of_speech

Furthermore, in the first half your first paragraph, well thanks for providing nuance to the debate, however, the argument itself remains, that the act, in and on itself is damaging.

"additionally, you, elchapetas, do frequently imply that people are certain things. whether or not this is always intentional i cannot confirm, but regardless, it does happen"

" there is no doubt that you were directly implying that Wiki Commentator was a seal clubber"

no he was practically beggin for controversy, so i gave it to him, see just how fast he took back most of his discourse, i rest my case.

"Elchepetas, are you saying that you wish for us to start deleting comments with profanity in them?"

are you trying to use hyperbole to tell me that even beeped profanity will no longer be tolerated?