Talk:Raijin/@comment-33413589-20171019131437/@comment-25163519-20171026214220

You seem to not know what credibility is. Credibility is the amount of experience you have in a perticular field. An I am certain that someone who has been playing the game for over a year and is at the end-game meta has more credibility than someone at the middle and beginning game meta. That does sound familliar, don't you think.

The Russian Griffin by iteself will take 5 salvos to kill a Raijin assuming it's the same level. But in a game, there will be more Russian Griffins, all of them wanting a peice of a yummy red trash can.

I'd like to get his clear. I am not a hater of the Raijin. I am a hater of bad advice, which you people in the wiki give loads of. You forget that the Bastion boost is only active while in Bastion. And if you want to be in Bastion, you must camp in one location or take 4 seconds to stand up, shoot, and stand down.

Do I really need the f*ucking proof the gravity exists? Or do I need the "solid evidence" that water is wet? Just take a look at the top meta. Ask anyone in Champion League which there are NONE active in the Wiki not including me. There's a reason why Raijins are not viable in top, and I'm sure I explained it before. Lets review the situation right now. A Diamond player is screaming his head off to the world that the Raijin is viable in Champion League, while a guy from Champion League is telling him that its not. Does sound rediculous?

The Dash bots are certainly not situational. They can be used for too many roles: midrange, brawler, capper, attacker, defender. Neither are the Lancelots, as they are one of the best close range support robots, attackers. The Fujin is pretty situational, you're right on that. So are the light bots. The Fury is not situational. The only thing you will have to worry about is Treb Butch, and they're rare to find in BR / Dom.

The point of mobility is that exact reason: Dash bots avoid damage, slow bots take damage. What's the point of using a Raijin when a Dash will outmaneuver you and take you out? And you are using the same argument too. I'd also like to see new ones. :-)

Other then that, you sir, are a dolt. Perhaps we can arrange for an Untrusted Contributer tag for you? Someone in the wiki was given that about a year ago, and the code's probably still in the CSS.

Or would you like Russel to tell you exactly what I just said?