Talk:Raijin/@comment-26530108-20161107071715/@comment-26530108-20161107152230

Or maybe it's because most bots have pros or cons that affect their usability? Maybe it's because I do have most of the bots have played them all before? Maybe it's because I am in contact with top tier players who know what they're doing? Maybe it is because I watch top tier players on youtube whenever I am compiling a list of things to buy and such?

Many, and I mean many people have tried to use the quad legged bots well before, and when I check back on them, they have always gone back to using rhinos, griffins, whatever they were using before.

We are talking about a bot's usability here, being nonbiased would mean giving the straight facts of as many experienced people as possible, being biased would actually be saying that every bot is okay no matter what.

It's a game, there are bots that are going to be non-objectively better than other bots, that is how games work and thrive on, by making you feel a sense of progression, take the stalker and the destrier for example. Or the destrier and the gareth. Or the destrier and the gepard. Take the boa and the vityaz as well, or the leo and the lancelot.

I have played in every tier before, and I have even been sent up against or with top tier clans like vox several times, I have gotten my ass kicked sometimes, but I have been able to at least fight back most of the time that has happened.

What I am getting at here, is that you are not also taking other's views into account when correcting a page. Many, and I mean many people here would recommend a thunder schutze for the lower tiers over a kwk schutze for instance.